This is a dynamic list of in-universe problems within the science-sphere of Distant Worlds, this list is dynamic and can expand upon further by those who have interesting question about phenomenas which have no explanation in-universe
It mimics the List of unsolved problems in physics on Wikipedia
General Physics
The ultimate query remains unanswered: is there a singular, all-encompassing, and internally consistent framework that unifies all known physical forces and particles? A Theory of Everything (ToE) would seamlessly link quantum mechanics, general relativity, and higher-dimensional structures into a coherent whole. Despite centuries of progress, this remains one of the deepest unsolved problems in theoretical physics.
While modern physics, particularly in the context of M-Theory, postulates the existence of 11 spatial dimensions where constants are determined by symmetry and boundary conditions, the question persists: Is there an absolute, universal constant—a truly dimension-independent value that transcends all boundaries of space and dimensional structure?
M Framework
The existence of self-similar, fractal-like patterns in the quantum structure of spacetime invites a profound question: what gives rise to these patterns? While Causal Dynamical Triangulation (CDT) offers a mathematical scaffold, it remains incomplete. Could Fractons, fermions native to Bridge-space, serve as structuring agents of this fractalized manifold in physical reality, beyond abstract models?
The foundational shape of the multiversal background remains elusive. Models consistently suggest dynamic, emergent geometry—but is there a static or inherent geometric blueprint beneath the fluctuations? Do the dimensions themselves possess a meta-structure, akin to a hidden manifold or holographic code?
In the modern theoretical landscape, the emergence of classical spacetime from quantum string theory or the AdS/CFT correspondence is poorly understood. How does smooth, continuous spacetime arise from fundamentally discrete or holographic origins? Does classical reality remain a valid conceptual model in the age of brane cosmology?
There are three types of matter, how to construct supersymmetric matter out of standard particle pairs? (squarks and selectrons), does matter consisting from photinos constantly emits electromagnetic waves (photons) in all directions?, How would Gluinos matter act?based on relations models of gravitationa wells (gravitino-graviton). Simulation using QuantaTransistor computers required
Has the geometry of the universe evolved over cosmic history? If so, what governed its morphing structure?
Why does the universe hold its current shape—a configuration that constrains energy packets into particular vibrational modes and gives rise to the particles of the Standard Model?
Is this a result of higher-dimensional resonance, or does it hint at a primordial meta-pattern?
There are three classes of matter, but how does one construct supersymmetric analogues using standard particle pairs?
How do squarks and selectrons cohere into stable supersymmetric matter? Would photino-based matter continuously emit low-energy photons due to quantum decay?
Could gluino matter behave analogously to graviton-gravitino relations, especially in high-gravity environments such as Gravitational Wells? These questions may only be solvable through high-fidelity simulation on Quantum-Transistor Computation Systems.
Within a 10-spatial dimensional model, do photons lose energy not through redshift alone, but via dissipation into higher-dimensional hyperspace? If so, does this slow energy leak over eons explain violations in energy conservation that remain undetected by classical measurements? Is Temporal Symmetry itself a dissipative force?
The Library
The Library's method of information transmission vastly exceeds the explanatory capacity of existing models. Attempts to simulate its mechanism via graviton-based gravitational wave propagation have proven insufficient. The structure of its signals may suggest physics operating beyond spacetime, or encoded in meta-dimensional harmonics.
The Library has reportedly disproven the indeterminism inherent in the Standard Model’s quantum field theories—yet the Archangel-derived generalization of M-Theory functions and predicts phenomena with unmatched precision.
What is the contradiction here?
Could it be that reality is deterministic at a meta-dimensional level, and indeterminism is a projection—an illusion within our lower-dimensional slice of the cosmos?